How might you define TPD?
TPD is defined as an approach to which policy makers communicate goals, visions, information and give guidance to educators (Gailble & Burns, 2005).
What are three common models of professional development?
The three common models of professional development are (a)Standardized TPD, (b)Site-based TPD, (c) Self-directed TPD.
Standardized TPD is considered as the approach which is most centralized among the three models. Training-based approaches like workshops and sessions are often used as instructors can share information with a larger number of educators. It is found to be effective in the context where we need teachers to be aware of new ideas and approaches in teaching and learning, but lack of after-training support can result in low adoption rate. Sometimes, a few teachers who received standardized TPD based training serves as “multipliers” in their own school by training their own colleagues in basic TPD.
Sited-based TPD tends to be more focused on local needs , and build local expertise. This is sometimes cultivated through the Community of Practice (COP) where there will be a significant core group of teachers being involved in professional development activities and sharing of expert knowledge. However, the school need to be aware that site-based TPD can be time intensive and involves recurrent expenditure.
Self-directed TPD, on the other hand, little or no cost to the school’s budget, as the teacher himself will bear the cost of the professional activities. Among the three models, self-directed TPD offers the most flexibility and opportunities for advanced-skilled teachers who want to improve on their skills and knowledge. This model is often used together with Standardized and/or Site-based TPD.
Which models are currently being used in your school?
In my institution, Standardized TPD and Site-Based TPD are currently being used.
In terms of Standardized TPD, being a vocational technical education institution, we organised an annual Teachers’ Conference event, where subject experts in teaching and learning are invited to share good practises with our teachers. Workshops and training sessions are also conducted every three months for expert teachers to impart teaching and learning strategies to novice teachers. The training introduces and builds awareness of effective strategies in lesson planning, learner-centred instructional strategies, authentic assessment practises, and use of LMS (Learning Management System). Teachers are also encouraged to attend training organised by other institutions, whether locally or overseas, to further enhance their knowledge in technical education.
For Site-Based TPD, each novice teacher (or mentee) is assigned to a mentor, who is actually often and experienced master teacher within the institution. The mentor will work with the mentee to identify professional development needs, as well as to work actively towards enhancing the mentee’s skills in teaching and learning. The duration of the mentoring will last for a period of 12 months, with various meetings and discussions to address specific growth points of the mentee. The mentee will also observe lessons of the mentor and other expert teachers, thus building a network of sharing ideas.
What are the needs of teachers in your school, and how might teacher professional development (TPD) address these needs?
As a vocational technical education institution, most of our teachers come from the private industries, with expert knowledge in their trade area. While they have the expert content knowledge in technical skills, some of them may be lacking in effective teaching and learning strategies if they do not have prior teaching experiences. Mentoring, as one possible application of Site-based TPD, gives these novice teachers an opportunity to learn from the master teachers (Smith, 2002). Mentoring also tends to evolve around professional development activities such as classroom observations, coaching, feedback which can positively result in enhancing the teaching skills of the novice teacher.
“Teacher learning is most likely when teachers collaborate with professional peers, both within and outside of their schools, and when they gain further expertise through access to external researchers and program developers” (King & Newmann, 2000, p. 576). This is in alignment with the Standardized TPD, through which the annual Teachers’ Conference event and other training opportunities (local and overseas) become a platform for teachers to gain access to new information.
Which of the three models of TPD are most appropriate to the needs of your teachers?
At this stage, I felt that there is no single model of TPD that will be adequate to fit the needs of all teachers within the institution. Differences among the community of teachers and school administrators can uniquely affect professional development processes of the institution (Guskey, 2003).
In my view, an integrated approach of Standardized TPD and Site-Based TPD Model will be adequate for most of the teachers’ needs in the next one to two years. However, I felt that the Self-directed TPD can be developed within the institution from the third year onwards, given that we take the next two years to specifically identify teachers with high level of expertise, high levels of motivation and autonomous, and who need opportunities for professional development that are not otherwise available.
In conclusion, to have the greatest impact on teachers through TPD, professional development should be designed and implemented to meet the needs the teachers within an identified setting.
References
Gaible, E., & Burns, M. (2005). Models and best practices in teacher professional development. In Using technology to train teachers: Appropriates uses of ICT for teacher professional development in developing countries (pp. 15-24). Washington, DC: infoDev/World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.294.html
Guskey, T. R.(2003). Analyzing lists of the characteristics of effective professional development to promote visionary leadership. NASP Bulletin. 87(637), 38-54.
King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2000). Will teacher learning advance school goals? Phi Delta Kappan. 81(8), 576- 580.
Smith, S. (2002). Teacher mentoring and collaboration. Journal of Special Education Technology. 17(1), 47-48.